Comments on: XP is not Irreducible Complexity http://blog.staffannoteberg.com/2008/02/20/xp-is-not-irreducible-complexity/ Same brain - more astute usage Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:01:03 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Staffan Nöteberg http://blog.staffannoteberg.com/2008/02/20/xp-is-not-irreducible-complexity/#comment-11 Staffan Nöteberg Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:28:51 +0000 http://brainmoda.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-11 I totally agree with the fact that a lot of circumstances are in constant change around a piece of software. That's one of the reasons for preferring an adaptive development process before an atomic branded process. Another reason for adaptive processes is that all software projects are unique already from the beginning. I totally agree with the fact that a lot of circumstances are in constant change around a piece of software. That’s one of the reasons for preferring an adaptive development process before an atomic branded process.

Another reason for adaptive processes is that all software projects are unique already from the beginning.

]]> By: Greg Burlington http://blog.staffannoteberg.com/2008/02/20/xp-is-not-irreducible-complexity/#comment-10 Greg Burlington Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:51:46 +0000 http://brainmoda.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-10 Software is not a sand castle. It is a castle on marshes. Changing requirements is only one dimension that is changing. In fact everything else undergoes changes as well. That is, only billing system that insists on milestones. Why pair programming and not triplet programming? http://www.verysimplefloorborder.com/CheatSheet/Kanban_Agile_Greg_Bobrowski.htm Ask for my answer if you care. Software is not a sand castle. It is a castle on marshes.

Changing requirements is only one dimension that is changing. In fact everything else undergoes changes as well. That is, only billing system that insists on milestones.

Why pair programming and not triplet programming?
http://www.verysimplefloorborder.com/CheatSheet/Kanban_Agile_Greg_Bobrowski.htm
Ask for my answer if you care.

]]>